Zum Inhalt springen
Design anpassen
Anpassen
Schriftgröße
Serif / Sans
Sans / Sans
Rundung
Abstand
Container-Breite
Seitenabstand
Sektionsabstand
Innenabstand
Schatten
Rahmen

Corporate

When a handshake isn't enough: The case for written shareholder agreements

Many Swiss SMEs operate without formal shareholder agreements. We explain why this is risky and what a good SHA should cover: with practical examples.

5 December 2025 2 Min. Lesezeit
When a handshake isn't enough: The case for written shareholder agreements

In our corporate practice, we regularly encounter established Swiss companies: profitable, well-run, with decades of history: that have no written shareholder agreement. The partners trust each other. They've always figured things out. Until they don't.

Why the CO isn't enough#

The Swiss Code of Obligations provides a default framework for share companies (AG) and limited liability companies (GmbH). But these defaults are designed for the general case, not for your specific partnership.

Without a shareholder agreement, the law determines:

  • Transfer restrictions: CO defaults are minimal: shares in an AG are freely transferable unless articles say otherwise
  • Decision-making: Simple majority rules, with limited minority protections
  • Exit scenarios: No obligation to buy out a departing partner
  • Deadlock: No mechanism if 50/50 partners disagree

What a good SHA covers#

A well-drafted shareholder agreement addresses six core areas:

1. Transfer restrictions and pre-emption rights#

Who can buy shares? In what order? At what price? A clear pre-emption cascade (Vorkaufsrecht) prevents unwanted third parties from entering the company.

2. Tag-along and drag-along#

Tag-along protects minorities: if the majority sells, minorities can join on the same terms. Drag-along protects majorities: if enough shareholders agree to sell, holdouts must participate. Both are essential for clean exits.

3. Valuation mechanism#

How are shares valued for internal transfers? Common approaches:

  • Formula-based: Revenue or EBITDA multiple, updated annually
  • Expert valuation: Independent appraiser, defined methodology
  • Hybrid: Formula as default, expert as fallback for disputes

4. Deadlock resolution#

For 50/50 partnerships, deadlock is existential. Options include:

  • Russian roulette clause: One partner names a price; the other must buy or sell at that price
  • Texas shoot-out: Both partners submit sealed bids; highest bidder buys
  • Mediation/arbitration escalation: Structured dispute resolution before nuclear options

5. Non-compete and confidentiality#

Shareholders (especially active ones) should be bound by non-compete and confidentiality obligations that survive their departure.

6. Succession and death#

What happens if a shareholder dies or becomes incapacitated? Buy-sell provisions funded by life insurance (Kreuzversicherung) can prevent a spouse or heir from becoming an unwanted business partner.

The cost of not having one#

We've seen disputes that cost more in legal fees than the company was worth. The most common triggers:

  • A partner wants to exit but there's no buyout mechanism or agreed valuation
  • A deceased partner's heirs demand a board seat
  • A minority shareholder blocks a sale because there's no drag-along

All of these are preventable with a properly drafted agreement.

When to do it#

The best time is at formation. The second-best time is now. The worst time is when you already have a dispute: at that point, you're negotiating from positions, not principles.

We typically prepare a shareholder agreement in two to three sessions with all partners. The investment is modest relative to the protection it provides.

Das könnte dich auch interessieren

Berger & Roth

Clarity in every case.

Boutique law firm in Zurich for corporate, employment, and commercial law, direct, discreet, and focused on outcomes.

A question about your case?

Book an initial consultation, confidential, without obligation, and directly with the lawyer who will handle your case.